Why do liberals have such double standards?
Liberals want to save animals, but kill unborn babies. (Abortions)
Liberals are against eating meat, yet don’t mind using dead babies for stem cell research.
Liberals are so gung-ho about equal rights and want gay marriage, yet they don’t mind the STATE regulating the CHURCH in terms of the word marriage. So much for separation of church and state.
Liberals attack Christians yet defend muslim radicals the ones who kill Americans.
Liberals like Michael Moore condemn rich people but are rich them selves.
Do I make myself clear?
Related Information:
Tagged with: Abortions • animals • christians • dead babies • eating meat • gay marriage • Gung Ho • liberals • marriage • michael moore • muslim • radicals • separation of church and state • stem cell research • unborn babies
Filed under: How To Save A Marriage
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
Because they live in the realm of lies. In the realm of truth, we always check the reality of a situation. They live in a world where contradiction is commonplace. To them, words mean different things depending on who is saying them. The Constitution means whatever they need it to mean. Global Warming is a fact because they choose to believe it is. Scientists who make this claim are desperately trying to avoid revealing their flawed data but to the Left they are bravely standing up to the "deniers". Even morality is relative to them; right is not necessarily right, wrong not necessarily wrong.
“Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.”
-Ayn Rand
*
Because if it werent for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.
Nothing like lumping us all together. Just to be straight, you don’t tell me what I believe.
you have made yourself clear, the rubber room is short one occupant
If it weren’t for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.
"Liberals want to save animals, but kill unborn babies. (Abortions)"
Funny, I don’t recall ever having been an animal rights activist. By the way, there’s a big difference between a six week fetus and a baby.
"Liberals are against eating meat,"
I had chicken parmesan for dinner.
"Liberals are so gung-ho about equal rights and want gay marriage, yet they don’t mind the STATE regulating the CHURCH in terms of the word marriage."
Perhaps the christian reich in this country needs regulations to keep them from meddling in other peoples lives.
"Liberals attack Christians yet defend muslim radicals the ones who kill Americans"
I hate muslims just as much as christians. Both sets of folklore are violent and misogynist.
"Liberals like Michael Moore condemn rich people but are rich them selves. "
I have never seen one of his films and I’m probably more well to do than you.
You’re not clear. You’re confused.
double standard? i don’t think you even know hat that means. how about when republicans thought bush was god after waiting six days to even mention the shoe bomber and viciously attacking obama after waiting two days to get the facts straight before he talked about it. you guys are going to lose in 2010.
i want to save animals and i don’t want to kill unborn babies. however, making something illegal doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. changing peoples minds (not the law) is the only way to stop abortion.
i am against eating meat, and i am in favor of scientific research.
i think gay people should be allowed to get married if they want to, but i do not favor any law that forces churches to marry gay people. instead, i want the state to get out of the way (they have better things to do anyway) and if a church wants to marry gays, let them.
i attack christian violence and muslim violence equally. and hindu violence and secular violence and violence in my own family. all violence is equally wrong in the eyes of the lord.
i like it when michael moore condemns the rich. and i can say that because i myself am quite poor.
clear as a bell
They are misfits. Outcasts of society.
I’m liberal and progressive through and through and I eat meat, only save animals to protect the biodiversity and enviroment we humans rely on, don’t care what the church does, don’t defend religious radicals of any faith, I’m not rich, I don’t condemn rich people – just greedy and selfish ones ones.
Your whole argument is complete b***sh**.
they want abortion but want the soldiers to stop killing babies – fact check: we dont kill babies.
they hate evil capitalism but want its money to fund socialist corupt countries.
you forgot to add these.
The liberal double standard goes way beyond that, because they control the debate. When conservatives change the terms of the debate by introducing facts, liberals start calling names to divert the attention back to their theory.
Look at the "health care reform" debate. Every time it was pointed out that this had nothing to do with health, or care, or reform, they changed the parameters of the debate, focusing on insurance companies. Once it was pointed out that their plan is the same as the insurance companies, they demonized the companies. Once it was pointed out that the government is far more uncaring and denies more than insurance companies, they changed the debate to cost. Once it was pointed out how much it would cost, the passed the bill in the middle of the night on Christmas eve.
And who can forget Al Gore getting owned on the debate of "climate change", he yelled "the debate is over", when it had barely began.
Millionaires go take a nap in a box on the street, and then go pick up a meal at Spago’s on the way to their 10,000 square foot mansions… all in the name feeling the pain of the homeless.
Barney Franks grows weed in his yard, runs a brothel out of his federal office, and then blames his boyfriend and throws a fit because a republican gets caught being closet gay.
My all time favorite was congress demanding companies that received a bailout pay their CEO’s a dollar a year and no bonus, until they repay the government. THis coming from a group that hasn’t balanced the budget or produced an understandable bill in 50 years.
1. Animals are conscious beings. A fetus in the first trimester has no consciousness.
2. Not all are against eating meet. Most of us are just against the inhumane methods of factory farming. And embryonic stem cell research comes from embryos that are being trashed at the IVF clinics. Since they are only a couple days old, have less cells than the amount of skin cell you shed in a second, have no orgran formation, no heart, no brain, no cns, and no consciousness, I dont see a problem with using them in research.
3. I disagree with this statement. Legal marriage has had nothing to do with religious marriage for a VERY long time, WAY before the lgbt rights movement started. And the state doesnt regulate the church. There is nothing in the legal marriage contract about regulating churches. Churches are still free to do their own thing, and to marry who they want or not who they dont want. Maybe the church should be advocating to completely remove marriage from the legal system if it is sooo religious that they have to legally discriminate against other people who do not live they way Christians want them to.
4. Actually, I dont attack, but certainly am critical of both sides. There are extremeists in both of those religions. And if you honestly think that no one is accusing every muslim of terrorism, maybe you should actually find someone who is Muslim and ask them what type of discrimination they experience.
5. I dont even know who that is, so I cant comment.
DO STEM CELL TREATMENTS WORK? http://www.repairstemcells.org/newsletters/NL100909.htm
THE STEM CELL PLACEBO EFFECT
http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/the-stem-cell-placebo-effect/
Of the over 2,700 “adult stem cell” clinical trials (1,500+ complete) and 7,540 “adult stem cell” scholarly papers, evidence supports that the risk of RSC treatments are about the same as the risks associated with drawing blood. (Standard safe practice of lab protocols removes these risks almost entirely.)
Tons more articles on stem cells versus heart/cardiac disease:
http://repairstemcell.wordpress.com/?s=heart+cardiac
With the assistance of Naper Design, we have our blog up and our network of Egg Donors is growing daily. We hope to make the first full network that brings donor, recipients, agencies and doctors together.
“1. Animals are conscious beings. A fetus in the first trimester has no consciousness.”
What does that have to do with NOT killing the animal BUT killing the fetus? The consciosness that the fetus will have (if its not mentally impaired) is far more benifitial to the human race if raised in a proper and caring environment. Raise the animal, spoil it, pet it, then kill it for food. It’s fuckin’ animal – it will have the potential to build bridges, choose lovers, choose friends etc. It wakes up, poops, cries, eats, and procreates when the time comes. The fetus IS the future – animals just sustain it, it’s the lowest denominator when humans are hungry.
This article is flawed, but it DOES point out standards that some liberals hold onto but won’t acknowledge because they think they’re “progressive” and/or open-minded.