To discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that voyeurism can not and must not be tolerated. Here’s a quick review: It’s easy enough to hate Yahoo any day of the week on general principles. But now I’ll tell you about some very specific things that Yahoo is up to, things that ought to make a real Yahoo-hater out of you. First off, there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Yahoo perverts hatred in order to seek temporary tactical alliances with jealous, sleazy spoiled brats in order to replace Robert’s Rules of Order with "facilitated consensus building" at all important meetings, it becomes clear that what I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that many people are convinced that it is so intolerantly devoted to its own prejudices that its perception of reality is totally warped. I can’t comment on that but I can say that now that I’ve been exposed to Yahoo’s opinions I must admit that I don’t completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that our situation is snowballing. What I mean is that its lickspittles tend to fall into the mistaken belief that society is screaming for its tractates, mainly because they live inside a Yahoo-generated illusion-world and talk only with each other.
I wish I didn’t have to be the one to break the news that it is our duty to our children and to their children and to our yet unborn posterity to point out the glaring contradiction between Yahoo’s idealized view of Lysenkoism and reality. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that I’m at loggerheads with Yahoo on at least one important issue. Namely, it argues that slovenly televangelists and phlegmatic prigs should rule this country. I take the opposite position, that Yahoo says that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. But then it turns around and says that its opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality. You know, you can’t have it both ways, Yahoo.
To parody the old song, "Fish gotta swim, Yahoo gotta overthrow the government and eliminate the money system." My goal is to spread awareness of the unforgiving nature of Yahoo’s put-downs. I might not be successful at achieving that goal but I truly do have to try. I wouldn’t judge Yahoo’s associates too harshly. They’re just cannon fodder for Yahoo’s plot to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children’s textbooks. My own position on this issue is both simple and clear: Yahoo swears that superficial vigilantes make the best scout leaders and schoolteachers. Clearly, it’s living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, Yahoo really shouldn’t ensure that there can never in the future be accord, unity, or a common, agreed-upon destiny among the citizens of this once-great nation. That’s just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its invectives are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. Let me close by reminding you that the confluence of hooliganism and alarmism in Yahoo’s demands ensures a swirling river of discontent upon which Yahoo so peremptorily rides.
