How many men realize that numerous state and federal laws require your family practitioner to routinely ask your wife/gf if you are beating her? This is the ‘men are guilty until proven innocent approach’. And you are paying this physician to do so?

My response to this was to simply stop getting annual exams. There is no way I’m going to pay some guy to treat me like a criminal. This concerns my wife, of course, but I point out that the loss in life expectancy for skipping annual exams is less than 1 year. This is less than the gain in life expectancy one can get from switching to a vegetarian lifestyle. It is also less than the gain one gets by eliminating alcohol and caffeine from one’s diet. In short, it is a small (statistically) effect. And I get to know that I am not supporting feminist bigotry. So while, I am sure, feminists ‘get off’ on knowing that men are damned if they do (do pay physicians to treat men like criminals) and damned if they don’t (which means that, at least statistically, they will die younger), I would rather be damned for not supporting feminist bigotry.

How about the rest of you?
It’s not a question of worrying. My wife has never hit me. Nor have I hit her.

It is a matter of principle. Do citizens have a right to not be searched without a warrant or not? (since they have committed no crime, "they have nothing to worry about") Do citizens have a right to not be drug-tested or not? (since they have not taken drugs, "they have nothing to worry about") Do citizens have a right to free speech or not? (since they are not advocating overthrow of the government, why shouldn’t they allow the government to "approve" their speech).

In short, the idea that the government should be handed powers that essentially render citizens "guilty until proven innocent" is a very bad one. This approach has been used by ruthless governments everywhere to abuse their citizens.

That is why I object.
Can’t feminist do homework? Laws covering this are spread throughout federal (both statutes and federal spending bills, including Medicare and Medicaid) and state laws. For one example, California code says:

CA Health § 1233.5 requires medical clinics to screen patients for domestic violence

CA Health § 1259.5a requires acute care, acute psychiatric, and chemical dependence recovery hospitals to routinely screen patients for domestic violence.

Protocol: CA Health § 1233.5 requires licensed clinic boards and medical directors to establish and adopt written policies and procedures to screen patients for domestic violence, document injuries and refer patients to available services.

CA Health § 1259.5 requires acute care, acute psychiatric, and chemical dependency recovery hospitals to establish written policies and procedures to screen patients for domestic violence, document injuries and refer patients to available services.


Related Information:

I need to find the cost per unit (profit per car) – I need some serious help!

I did all the work, I just don’t know how to answer the cost-per-unit question concerning profit per car.

4. Assume the same 10 year life expectancy, using the previous case, justify the purchase using the Cost-per-Unit method. (Show your work) Use profit per car.

Bud Ray is the owner of an automatic car wash located in a busy side of town. He currently has all the business he can handle and then some. His business has grown steadily over the years. His current car wash equipment is in need of a complete overhaul. Jim Dandy is a sales rep. for Magic Wash and sells equipment for rebuilding car wash systems or new start up car wash systems. Jim however would rather sell the new system as he knows there will be less problems in the future since there would be no make-shift conversions to adapt to his current system. The cost difference is substantial. In order to rebuild Bud’s current system, it will cost 4,000.00. To purchase a new Magic Wash Sparkle II system, the cost is 0,000.00. The rebuilt system would have the capacity to wash 40 cars per day at .95 per car. In addition, it will cost $.48 per car in detergent and rinsing agents. The new Magic Wash Sparkle II would have a capacity of 60 cars per day, and the detergent and rinsing agents would only cost $.23 per car because of the special “soap saver” feature. This feature is only available on the new system. Both systems have an expected 10 year life span. The car wash operates 200 days per year.

1.For the expected life expectancy of the Magic Wash Sparkle II, how would you justify the purchase using the “Price Vs Cost” method? (Show your work) Use profit for each.

The Magic Wash Sparkle II costs 0,000. It can handle 60 cars per day @ .95. Thanks to the special “soap saver,” the cost of detergent and rinsing agents is only $.23 per car.

.95 – $.23 (cost of soap to car wash)

From this we can assume the real profit per car is .72.
.95 – $.23 (cost of soap to car wash)

Since the car wash can handle 60 washes per day, assuming there are a total of 60 washes, the profit per day will be the total number of car washes times the profit per car.

.72 x 60 = 3.2

If the car wash operates at 200 days per year, we need to find the total profit. If one day yields 3.20 we just multiply by 200 to find the total profit.
3.20 x 200 days = ,640/year(200 days).

Then, backed by the 10 year life expectancy warranty. We take the profit per year of the Magic Wash II by 10 years.

,640 x 10 = 6,400

The profit is 6,400. The initial cost was 0,000.

Subtract both to find price vs cost.

6,400 – 0,000 = 6,400

**************************************…

The rebuilt system costs 4,000. It can handle 40 cars per day @ .95. Yet, the cost is $.48 per car from the soaps and detergents.

From this we can assume the real profit per car is .47.
.95 – $.23 (cost of soap to car wash)

Since the car wash can handle 40 washes per day, assuming there are a total of 40 washes, the profit per day will be the total number of car washes times the profit per car.

.47 x 40 = 8.80

If the car wash operates at 200 days per year, we need to find the total profit. If one day yields 8.80 we just multiply by 200 to find the total profit.
8.80 x 200 days = ,760/year(200 days).

Then, backed by the 10 year life expectancy warranty. We take the profit per year of the Magic Wash II by 10 years.

,760 x 10 = 7,600.

The profit is 7,600. The initial cost was 4,000.
Subtract to find price vs cost.
7,600 – 4,000 = 3,600


Related Information: